Legal Opinion

Gramercy Hill Enterprises v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1998No. S-97-675PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

Gramercy Hill Enterprises (Gramercy), appellant, is a residential retirement center which sought to add 60 skilled nursing beds to its existing facility. Gramercy appeals the district court’s order affirming the decision of the Certificate of Need Review Committee (Review Committee) which had affirmed the decision of the Nebraska Department of Health, now known as the Department of Health and Human Services (Department), to deny Gramercy a certificate of need (CON). For the reasons recited below, we affirm the district court’s order.

BACKGROUND

On October 6, 1995, Gramercy filed an application…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Klinger v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. Klinger v. Nebraska Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. AtkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Vinci v. NEB. DEPT. OF CORR. SERVICESNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Department of Health v. Grand Island Health Care, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Benitez v. RasmussenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sepulveda v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Moore v. DEPT. OF CORR. SERVS. APPEALS BD.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Jim Earp Chrysler-Plymouth, Ltd.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Moore v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services Appeals BoardNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API