Legal Opinion

Chrysler Corp. v. Jim Earp Chrysler-Plymouth, Ltd.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1999No. A-98-973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Inbody, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Jim Earp Chrysler-Plymouth, Ltd. (Earp), a Nebraska partnership, appeals the order of the Lancaster County District Court finding that Papillion, Sarpy County, Nebraska, is not located within the sales locality covered by Earp’s franchise agreement with Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler). This appeal is taken pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, specifically Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-918 (Reissue 1994). See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-1435 (Reissue 1998). For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the order of the district court.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Earp is a licensed motor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wolgamott v. AbramsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Daehnke v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Label Concepts v. Westendorf Plastics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Petska v. Olson Gravel, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Torrison Ex Rel. Torrison v. OvermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Honda Cars of Bellevue v. American Honda Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Lee Janssen Motor Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API