Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Lucero
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1996No. 22683PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
1. James and Bette Stewart sued Horace and Julie Lucero for debt owing under a sales agreement whereby the Stewarts transferred a Sears Authorized Catalog Sales Merchant business to the Luceros and another couple. The Luceros counterclaimed with allegations of statutory and regulatory violations concerning disclosure and allegations of fraudulent representations that induced the Luceros to enter into the sales agreement. The trial court found that the Stewarts had made no material misrepresentations and that the Luceros owed the Stewarts $20,-225.69. The court entered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Kirkpatrick v. Introspect Healthcare Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Neptune T.V. & Appliance Service, Inc. v. Litton Microwave Cooking Products Division, Litton Systems, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- McFadden v. ImusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dfs Secured Healthcare Receivables Trust v. Caregivers Great Lakes, Inc. And Marc LeestmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Magnolia Mountain Ltd. Partnership v. Ski Rio Partners, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- MBH, INC. v. John Otte Oil & Propane, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lopez v. Delta Int'l Mach. Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Branch v. CHAMISA DEVELOPMENT CORP., LTD.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.