Legal Opinion
Magnolia Mountain Ltd. Partnership v. Ski Rio Partners, Ltd.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 2005No. 24,740PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} In this case, we decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside a default judgment of foreclosure on a finding that the defendant had not presented a meritorious defense. Holding that the trial court acted within its discretion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} This case arises out of a default judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee, Magnolia Mountain Limited Partnership. Defendant-Appellant, Ski Rio Partners, does not dispute that the note was in default, but many of the other pertinent facts are disputed. Defendant’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ocana v. American Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Randles v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. EdwardsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Alarcon v. Albuquerque Pub. Schs. Bd. of Educ.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re BrutscheUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.