Legal Opinion

De Rosa v. Fordham University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment herein, insofar as it adjudges that the defendant Fordham University have judgment dismissing the complaint of the plaintiffs, reversed on the law, with costs to abide the event, and new trial directed of the action as against said defendant; and judgment dismissing the complaint as against the defendant Robert Capobianeo affirmed, without costs. The trial was before a jury; and, the judgment in favor of defendant Fordham having been entered upon a dismissal by the trial court at the close of the evidence, the issue to be resolved here is whether the plaintiff made out a prima facie…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sagorsky v. MalyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Osipoff v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Hogle v. H. H. Franklin Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Ford v. Grand Union Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Fitzpatrick v. Garrison & West Point Ferry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zimring v. WendrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Murphy v. Turian House, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Martinez v. SantoroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Muniz v. Flohern, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API