Legal Opinion

Muniz v. Flohern, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenberger, J.

This appeal places before us the question of whether a landlord may be held liable for the injury to a pedestrian outside of his building caused by a bullet shot from inside the premises during a robbery of the allegedly known, illegal "drug supermarket” operated therein. The plaintiffs are a nine-year-old boy who was permanently blinded when he was shot in the head while passing in front of defendants-respondents’ building, and his mother. Upon review of the record herein, we conclude that respondents were not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Miller v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Kush v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Waters v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilmartin v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Simmons v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API