R. S. E., Inc. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has filed this antitrust action against fourteen corporate and individ*703ual defendants, alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2, sections 3 and 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 14 & 18, the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13, and the law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Five of the defendants have filed a motion to strike the allegations contained in paragraph 55 in the complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) (immaterial allegations). Paragraph 55 is an ad damnum clause in which plaintiff seeks $5,000,000 in actual and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ryer v. Harrisburg Kohl Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Mitchell v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- A v. BDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996