Legal Opinion

A v. B

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*457MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL

WEBER, District Judge.

Two newly filed actions have been brought before me for certain ex parte action which required me to review the Complaint which had not yet been served. In each instance the ad damnum clauses to the various counts or causes of action set forth very large, very round and very easily remembered figures for the unliquidated damages demanded.

There is no requirement of federal pleading that this be done. The only allegations necessary are that the claim exceeds the jurisdictional amount, where such is required, and the items of special damages shall be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joyce v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Stein v. MeyerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Mitchell v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  2. Ayoub v. Helm's Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. R. S. E., Inc. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API