Legal Opinion
Vertner v. Vertner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 16, 1934No. 6034PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from an order in the Supreme Court of the District denying leave to intervene in a partition proceeding.
According to the averments of the tendered petition, Edmund K. Vertner (an ap-pellee), a resident of Florida, and one of several tenants in common of real estate in the District of Columbia, was made a party defendant in the partition suit in which appellant seeks to intervene, Vertner filed an answer to the bill seeking partition, admitting its allegations. Appellant, wife of Vertner, and a resident of Virginia, sought leave to file an intervening petition,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ex Parte CuttingSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In Re Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ex Parte Leaf Tobacco Board of Trade of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Melvin v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Scholla v. Scholla (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Simons v. SimonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Burrow v. Citizens' State BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.