Gillitzer v. Ducharme
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The note in suit became due December 1, 1921, and the only question on this appeal is whether the action was barred as to Ducharme by the six-year statute of limitations. Secs. 330.15, 330.19, Stats. Interest due on December. 1st of each year had been paid by Kremer for the years 1918 to 1927, inclusive, but it was contended on behalf of Ducharme that he had not made or authorized those interest payments; and that he had not continued or renewed his obligation by any written promise or acknowledgment.
*270By a special verdict the jury found that on October 29, 1927, plaintiff, at the request of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winchell v. . HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Braasch v. BondeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Cleveland v. HarrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- McLean v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- National Bank v. CottonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Accola v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Erickson v. HusemollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Bowe v. La BuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Kline v. FritschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Bernloehr v. FredricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.