Legal Opinion
Kline v. Fritsch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRry, C. J.
Sec. 330.47, Wis. Stats., provides as follows:
“If there are two or more joint contractors or joint executors or administrators of any contractor, no one of them shall lose the benefit of the provisions of this chapter (Limi*53tations of Commencement of Actions and Proceedings) so as to be chargeable, by reason only of any payment made by any other or others of them.”
It is the contention of the appealing defendant that under the terms of this section the payments made by John F. Fritsch did not operate to toll the statute of limitations which was set up by the appealing defendant, and therefore…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hughes v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- State Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. VickeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
- Schreiner v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Jackson v. Home Nat. Bank of BairdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Reinig v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Accola v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Bowe v. La BuyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Long v. MatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Schmidt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Schneider v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938