Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Kerr
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 16, 1982No. C-3-81-035PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY ON PENDING MOTIONS; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT SUSTAINED; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OVERRULED IN PART AND SUSTAINED IN PART; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY ACTION OVERRULED; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action have filed two complaints. The original complaint was filed by Shirley Thompson and Joseph S. Thompson, citizens of Kentucky, and Thompson Mobile Modulars, Inc. (Modulars), a company incorporated in Kentucky, of which the individual Plaintiffs were president and vice-president, respectively.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Reyes Martínez v. Oriental Federal Savings BankSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
- In Re Corestates Trust Fee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re Corestates Trust Fee LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Bell v. Midwestern Educational Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.