Crisp Human Capital Ltd. v. Authoria Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
In this contract dispute, the plaintiff, Crisp Human Capital Limited (“CHC”), has filed a motion to amend its complaint against Authoria Inc. (“Authoria”) 1) to bolster its claim of fraud with additional factual allegations and 2) to add a claim under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 93A. Authoria has opposed that motion.
I. Background
A. Factual Background
On or about March 30, 2007, CHC, a British company that distributes and resells “Human Capital” software and support services, entered into a Re-seller Agreement (“the Agreement”)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Frullo v. LandenbergerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Armstrong v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- U.S. Funding, Inc. of America v. Bank of Boston Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Libby v. Park, Marion & Vernon Streets Operating Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Libby v. Park Marion and Vernon Streets Operating Company LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Moog, Inc. v. ClearMotion, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020