Legal Opinion

Crisp Human Capital Ltd. v. Authoria Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 28, 2009No. Civil Action 08-11404-NMGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

In this contract dispute, the plaintiff, Crisp Human Capital Limited (“CHC”), has filed a motion to amend its complaint against Authoria Inc. (“Authoria”) 1) to bolster its claim of fraud with additional factual allegations and 2) to add a claim under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 93A. Authoria has opposed that motion.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

On or about March 30, 2007, CHC, a British company that distributes and resells “Human Capital” software and support services, entered into a Re-seller Agreement (“the Agreement”)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Frullo v. LandenbergerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Armstrong v. Rohm and Haas Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. U.S. Funding, Inc. of America v. Bank of Boston Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Libby v. Park, Marion & Vernon Streets Operating Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. Libby v. Park Marion and Vernon Streets Operating Company LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  4. Moog, Inc. v. ClearMotion, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API