Legal Opinion
Libby v. Park, Marion & Vernon Streets Operating Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 20, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17–10843–JGDPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
On January 19, 2017, the plaintiff served BHCC with a 93A demand letter by certified mail, return receipt requested. (Id. ¶ 80).
Additional facts will be provided below where appropriate.
III. ANALYSIS
A. Standard of Review
Chapter 93A claims that do not involve fraud, are not subject to heightened pleading requirements. Crisp Human Capital Ltd. v. Authoria Inc., 613 F.Supp.2d 136, 139 (D. Mass. 2009). Motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) test the sufficiency of the pleadings. When confronted with such a motion, the court accepts as true all well-pleaded facts and draws all reasonable…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schatz v. Republican State Leadership CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Margo Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Carrero-Ojeda v. Autoridad de Energia ElectricaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ericson v. Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024