Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Krasnow

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1939No. Appeal, 40PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, Sam Diamond, in an action to recover damages for injuries which he alleges resulted from what is commonly known and referred to as “trade libel,” circulated, as the plaintiff alleged, by Sam Krasnow, the defendant.

The facts as disclosed by the record are briefly as follows: Defendant is a wholesale fruit and produce dealer in the produce district of the City of Pittsburgh. He and other wholesale dealers are members of the Pittsburgh Produce Credit Association. One of the charter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boyer v. Pitt Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Conroy v. Pittsburgh TimesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Hayes v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Price v. ConwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Hartman v. Hyman & LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Altoona Clay Products, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Altoona Clay Products, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Friday v. Official Detective Stories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Altoona Clay Products, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. C. R. Grove, Joined as by Court Order. Altoona Clay Products, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. C. R. Grove, Joined as by Court OrderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API