Legal Opinion
Tijero v. Aaron Bros.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 19, 2013No. Case No: C 10-01089-SBAPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Docket 93
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge
This is a wage-and-hour hybrid collective action and class action brought by Plaintiffs Jose Tijero (“Tijero”) and Amanda Godfrey (“Godfrey”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated non-exempt hourly employees employed by Aaron Brothers, Inc. (“Defendant”) from May 7,2005 to the present. The operative complaint alleges that Plaintiffs have violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Millan v. Cascade Water Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Rodriguez v. Danell Custom Harvesting, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Bailey v. Romanoff Floor Covering, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Beltran v. Olam Spices and Vegetables, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Billups-Larkin v. Aramark Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.