Legal Opinion

Billups-Larkin v. Aramark Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 17, 2023No. 3:21-cv-06852Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TIARA BILLUPS-LARKIN, 10 Case No. 21-cv-06852-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 12 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 In 2021, Plaintiff filed this putative wage and hour class action against Defendant Aramark 18 Services, Inc. (“Aramark”), in state court alleging violations of California law. Defendant 19 thereafter removed, and the parties proceeded with informal discovery and engaged in private 20 mediation. The parties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Class v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Ginger McCall v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API