Legal Opinion

Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The alleged employer and its insurance carrier appeal from an award of death benefits made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board *955to the widow of Anton Boehm, deceased. The appeal is based solely on the ground that at the time of the accidental injury there was no relationship of employee and employer between the decedent and alleged employer. Decedent was employed as a casual porter. The accident happened after his regular hours of employment had terminated, but there was proof that he often performed some services after hours and received remuneration therefor by way of refreshments. The board…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Kleid v. Carr Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Hill v. KingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. Hawksford v. Steinbacher Packing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API