Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
The issue is whether appellant corporation (Camphill) is a covered employer under the Disability Benefits Law (Workmen’s Compensation Law, §§ 200-242) and, therefore, obliged to satisfy the statutory insurance requirements. It has been so determined by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the determination has been unanimously confirmed, with a memorandum decision, by the Appellate Division. Camp-hill contends that the undisputed evidence shows that it is a charitable corporation, whose coworkers are not employees, but volunteers, and that, therefore, the coworkers are expressly exempted from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Matter of Electrolux CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Hall v. Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Enderby v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Matter of Seymour v. Odd Fellows' HomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Higgins v. Monroe Evening NewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Claim of Fitzpatrick v. Holimont, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Henderson-Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. ApostolouColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.