Legal Opinion

Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.

The issue is whether appellant corporation (Camphill) is a covered employer under the Disability Benefits Law (Workmen’s Compensation Law, §§ 200-242) and, therefore, obliged to satisfy the statutory insurance requirements. It has been so determined by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the determination has been unanimously confirmed, with a memorandum decision, by the Appellate Division. Camp-hill contends that the undisputed evidence shows that it is a charitable corporation, whose coworkers are not employees, but volunteers, and that, therefore, the coworkers are expressly exempted from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Matter of Electrolux CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Matter of Hall v. Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Enderby v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Matter of Seymour v. Odd Fellows' HomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Monroe Evening NewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Claim of Fitzpatrick v. Holimont, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Henderson-Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. ApostolouColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API