Legal Opinion
T. v. Engineers, Inc. v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1961No. 2616PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant corporation was found guilty on an information charging that it did “by a sign represent itself to be a Professional Engineer and through the use of a title including the word engineers, to wit: ‘T. V. Engineers,’ imply that it is a Professional Engineer, without first being registered in the District of Columbia so to do.”
Our Professional Engineers’ Registration Act 1 declares the practice of engineering to be subject to regulation in the public interest, and provides for the registration of professional engineers. The Act makes it a misdemeanor for anyone to:
“…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. Standard Engineering Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Bush v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Potomac Engineers, Inc. v. WalserDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Potomac Engineers, Incorporated v. Daniel Walser, Chairman, Comprising the District of Columbia Board of Registration for Professional EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- McWhorter v. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors ex rel. BaxleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Rasa Engineering Corp. v. DaubónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Iowa State Board of Engineering Examiners v. Electronic Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors v. International Business Machines Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- McWhorter v. STATE BD. OF REGISTRATION, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.