Legal Opinion
Bush v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1951No. 958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle in the District of Columbia without having a District of Columbia operator’s permit. Section 40 — 301 of the 1940 Code, Supp. VII, provides for the issuing of motor vehicle operators’ permits by the District of Columbia authorities, and paragraph (e) of said section provides : “No individual shall operate a motor vehicle in the District, except as provided in section 40 — 303, without having first obtained an operator’s permit * * * issued under the provisions of this chapter”. Section 40 — 303(a) provides: “The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Vincent v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Santos v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- T. v. Engineers, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- Hagans v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Carper v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025