Legal Opinion

Solicitor for Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, J.

This application for intervention is made pursuant to clause (d) of subdivision 1 of section 193-b of the Civil Practice Act, the movant claiming he “is so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property in the custody of, or subject to the control of or disposition by, the court or an officer thereof.” The movant claims that he wishes to bring an action in this State against his mother, a resident of Scotland; that the fund which is involved in this action belongs to his mother; and that if the plaintiff in this action should be successful the fund…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Columbia Gas & Electric CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Solicitor for Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Cicci v. HumphreysNew York County Court, Schuyler County · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API