Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
We are to determine whether the record before us serves to qualify Robert William Maitland-Tennent — to whom reference will be made as the applicant — to intervene in this action pursuant to clause (d) of subdivision 1, section 193-b of the Civil Practice Act. That statute, insofar as material to our inquiry, provides: “ § 193-b. Intervention. 1. Upon timely application any person shall be permitted to intervene in an action, including, but not limited to, an action for a sum of money only: * * * (d) when the applicant is so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Radford Iron Co. v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Harrington Bros. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- Solicitor for Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Solicitor for Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Menendez v. Faber, Coe & Gregg, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Aroch v. 391 Broadway LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026