Legal Opinion

Solicitor for Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

Motion to permit the applicant to intervene in this action or in the alternative to direct the city treasurer to satisfy the judgment obtained by the applicant out of the moneys held by the city treasurer to the credit of this action is denied without prejudice to the applicant’s right to proceed under section 922 of the Civil Practice Act or otherwise to satisfy the judgment. The prior decision of Mr. Justice Hecht (198 Misc. 751), denying intervention on the ground that the interest of the applicant, as an attaching creditor is not such an interest in the fund as to entitle him to intervene…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrington Bros. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  2. Solicitor for Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API