Legal Opinion

Shellenbarger v. Fewel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1912No. 1681PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by William M. Fewel against John H. Shellenbarger. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

Suit for possession of lands, cancellation of deeds, and to quiet title. This action was filed July 13, 1908, in the district court of Tulsa county. The cause was submitted to and tried- by the court, by agreement of the parties, on an agreed statement of facts, summarized as follows: That Minnie Solander was a duly enrolled citizen by blood of the Creek Nation, and entitled to an allotment at the date of her death, intestate, October 8, 1899; that she left surviving, her husband, George Solander, and one child, Hettie Solander, and a sister Phoebe Trusler; that Hettie was…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coachman v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Cook v. ChildsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McKee v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. Ned v. CountissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. McDonald v. RalstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API