Legal Opinion

Ridens Et Al. v. Illinois Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1975No. 74-1003PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sup. Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hollis Watkins v. Kirk Fordice, Governor of the State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ward v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Carolyn HUCKEBY, Plaintiff, v. FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS, Defendant-Appellee, v. Alice BOBO, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. City of Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API