Hollis Watkins v. Kirk Fordice, Governor of the State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
Black citizens of Mississippi (Appellants) complain on appeal that the three-judge district court erred in calculating the amount of attorneys’ fees it awarded them under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973¿(e), and the Civil Rights Attorneys’ Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988 (West Supp.1993). Mississippi officials 1 (the State) argue on cross-appeal that Appellants did not prevail in the underlying action and, thus, should not recover attorneys’ fees. We vacate and remand. 2
I. BACKGROUND
Using 1990 census data, Mississippi in 1991 redistricted both…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by332 opinions
- Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- El Apple I, Ltd. v. OlivasTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Walker v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Tollett v. The City of KemahCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Green v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational FundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
327 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.