Security Insurance Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The following issues are presented on appeal :
1. Was a valid policy of workmen’s compensation coverage in effect by the activities of appellant, such that the requirements of cancellation under sec. 102.31 (1) (a), Stats., had to be met before coverage would cease?
2. Does the language of sec. 102.31 (1) (a), Stats., require the filing of a written notice of cancellation with the department in all cases even if the insured had procured coverage with another insurer?
3. Should the appellant insurer or correspondent insurer be awarded costs?
Existence of a policy by sec. 102.81 (1) (a), Stats.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Piscitello v. BoscarelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Bulman v. BulmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Weed v. LepiankaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Kamikawa v. KeskinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- KNOX COUNTY FEED AND HATCHERY INC. v. IversIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoeft v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989