Legal Opinion

Bulman v. Bulman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The appeal comes to this court on a statement of facts, in lieu of a record and transcript, from which it appears that on the day of the accident, July 28, 1953, the automobile owned by Odin Kittleson was being operated by Dana Bulman with the owner’s permission; that Hilda Bul-man was the only person injured in the accident; that the automobile was insured by Badger State Casualty Company under a policy of insurance which declared:

“Item 3. The insurance afforded is only with respect to such and so many of the following coverages as are indicated by a specific premium charge or charges. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ehlers v. Automobile Liability Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Housner v. Baltimore-American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Engh v. Calvert Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Mullen v. WalczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Holtz v. Mutual Service Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. James Louis Wiesmueller and August Wiesmueller v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API