Legal Opinion

Harris v. NACHAMSON DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1957No. 310PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Plaintiff, to recover, must predicate her right of action on some breach of duty owing to her as an employee or invitee of Red Cross. Jordan v. Miller, 179 N.C. 73, 101 S.E. 550. Her asserted right to recover is particularized in three respects: (1) failure to provide adequate handrails along the sides of the stairs; (2) failure to provide adequate lights; and (3) failure .to provide adequate janitorial service.

The rental contract imposed no duty to provide rails different from those then in use. There is no suggestion of failure to properly maintain the then existing rails. The fact that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Revis v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Barnes v. Hotel O.Henry Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Pratt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Lee v. H. L. Green & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Newton v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API