Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Warfield

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 10, 1941No. 7417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

The trial judge found as the facts of this case: “That on May 6, 1936, the plaintiff, a colored woman seventy-five years of age, being the owner in fee simple of parts of Lois 33 and 34 in William S. Roose’s subdivision of Lots in Square 192 in the District of Columbia, subject to Deed of Trust of $3,700.00, conveyed said property to the defendants in consideration of the valuable aid being given by the defendants and in consideration of their promise and agreement to provide and furnish the plaintiff with the necessities of life including living quarters during the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Shakespeare v. . MarkhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Langley v. Irons Land & Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. Max Ammerman v. City Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. City Stores Company v. AmmermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  3. Kakaes v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Eckert v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API