Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. M & M REFORESTATION

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1993No. 90-18415; CA A73039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that his aggravation claim was non-compensable. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 656.304(6) and ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

The facts, as found by the referee and adopted by the Board, are undisputed. On November 17, 1988, claimant injured his low back while working as a laborer for M & M Reforestation (employer) on a Christmas tree farm. On November 23,1988, a CT scan of the lumbar spine revealed a disc bulge at L5-S1. A second CT scan in March, 1989, showed the left-sided bulge at L5-S1 and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jocelyn v. Wampler Werth FarmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Jocelyn v. Wampler Werth FarmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Jocelyn v. Wampler Werth FarmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Marcum v. City of HermistonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API