Legal Opinion

Jocelyn v. Wampler Werth Farms

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 1994No. WCB 92-08595; CA A80290PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*167WARREN, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in determining that his aggravation claim is not compensable, because he has not satisfied the requirement of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and shown that the initial compensable injury is the major contributing cause of his worsened condition. We reverse.

Claimant experienced a compensable low back injury in 1987 while working for employer. The injury was diagnosed as a strain, superimposed on a preexisting, non-work related degenerative disc condition. Before and after the 1987 injury, CT…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Welliver Welding Works v. FarmenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. ATS, INC. v. ListenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Olson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Jocelyn v. Wampler Werth FarmsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API