Legal Opinion
In Re Farmer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 12, 1997No. 79,237PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.:
This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Respondent James L. Farmer, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the state of Kansas, whose business address is in Kansas City, Kansas.
The facts are not disputed. Respondent did not file exceptions to the hearing panel’s report. Under Rule 212(c) and (d) (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 226), the report is deemed admitted.
Respondent has admitted violations of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) 1.1 (1997 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 268) (a lawyer shall provide competent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- In Re SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- In Re VeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KimmelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- In Re JuhnkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- In Re RickmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. JohnstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.