Legal Opinion

Wheaton v. Department of Health & Human Services

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Tammie Wheaton appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Mead, J.) affirming a decision of the Department of Health and Human Services concluding that Whea-ton’s receipt of $500 in unrestricted monthly income as a result of her divorce property settlement agreement precludes her from being eligible for the subsistence benefit of food stamps. Wheaton contends that the payment she receives represents a property settlement that should not be classified as income for the purposes of food stamp regulations, see 7 C.F.R. § 273.9(b) (2007), and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Cobb v. Board of Counseling Professionals LicensureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. Nicholson v. BOARD OF LICENSURE IN MEDICINESupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Becker v. Bureau of Parks & LandsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kane v. Commissioner of Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Rangeley Crossroads Coalition v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. Rangeley Crossroads Coalition v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API