Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 24, 1996No. 96-1435PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Nearly four centuries ago, an English playwright wrote of a young monarch exhort ing his battle-weary comrades to stride “once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more.” William Shakespeare, King Henry the Fifth, Act III, Sc. 1, 1.1 (1600). Nancy and Lyle Strickland, the appellants here, issue a similar call, again requesting that this court invalidate a regulation which the Secretary of Agriculture (the Secretary) promulgated under authority granted by the Food Stamp Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2011-2025 (1988) (the Act). In Strickland v. Commissioner, Me. Dept. of Human…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hutchison v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Becker v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Lattab v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API