Adams v. MHC Colony Park Ltd. Partnership
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
More than 80 residents of a 186-space mobilehome park sued the owner for failing to properly maintain the park’s physical improvements and common facilities, including the park’s sewer system, water pressure, electrical system, and matters related to security such as street lighting. The residents pursued claims for nuisance, breach of contract and negligence. After a 43-day jury trial, the jury found in favor of only six residents.
The losing residents filed this appeal, asserting instructional error, inconsistent special verdicts, and the erroneous exclusion of impeachment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wallace v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 6354 Figarden General PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Harb v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Rancho Pauma Mutual Water Co. v. Yuima Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. Recovery Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.