Legal Opinion
Kehaya v. Axton
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
The individual defendants have appeared specially herein, and are now moving to vacate a warrant of attachment, heretofore granted in this action, and all proceedings had hereunder.
The warrrant of attachment was issued in the New York State Supreme Court against the property of the individual defendants, and pursuant thereto there was levied upon and seized a check of the individual defendants found within the jurisdiction of the New York State Court. Subsequently the action was removed to, and is now pending in the Federal Court.
This motion to vacate is made pursuant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. . QuincyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Ernst v. Rutherford & Boiling Springs Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Ernst v. Rutherford & Boiling Springs Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Kehaya v. AxtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Application of BlakemanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Barron v. Winchester Broadcasting Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. ParishDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1947