American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRLEY WOHL KRAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff American Permahedge, Inc. (“American Permahedge”) moves, pursuant to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order enjoining defendant B arcana, Inc. from manufacturing, using or selling Barcana’s “Evergreen Hedge” product on the grounds that the “Evergreen Hedge” infringes upon plaintiffs patent for the “American Permahedge.” Defendants Barcana, Inc. and National Metal Industries, Inc. 1 (collectively “Barcana”) oppose plaintiffs motion and cross-move for an order, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Ricoh v. Nashua Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995