Legal Opinion
American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1995No. 92 Civ. 6369 (SWK)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this patent infringement action, defendants Barcana, Inc. and National Metal Industries, Inc. (collectively, “Barcana”) renew their motion, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff American Permahedge, Inc.’s (“American Perma-hedge”) patent infringement claim against them. For the reasons set forth below, Bar-cana’s motion is granted.
*157BACKGROUND1
I. The ’647 Patent and the Evergreen Hedge
American Permahedge is in the business of marketing and selling artificial shrubbery designed to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.