Legal Opinion
Wichita Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Comark
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 25, 1984No. 82 Civ. 4703 (MEL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
The third-party defendants move pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) Fed.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The motion is denied.
I
This action was commenced in July 1982 by the plaintiffs, five savings and loan associations and one municipality, against the defendants, Comark, a California limited partnership, and Marine Midland Bank, N.A., (“Marine”) a national bank. Comark is a limited partnership, engaged in the business of buying and selling government securities. Comark is organized under the laws of California, with headquarters…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Haar v. Armendaris Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Dixon v. MacKDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- GB Marketing USA Inc. v. Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- PaineWebber Inc. v. Westgate Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Ables & Hall BuildersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.