Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Szeszku & Government Employees Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin Rodell, J.

This is an action to declare the rights of the parties pursuant to an auto liability policy issued by the plaintiff GEICO to the defendant claimant. While incorrectly denominated an application to stay arbitration (see CPLR 7503), defendant has ¿ppeared and answered and a review of the papers before the court reveals an agreed statement of facts. Therefore, the court will deem this proceeding to be an action for declaratory judgment (CPLR 103, subd [c]; Matter of Lakeland Water Dist. v Onondaga County Water Auth., 24 NY2d 400) and decide the matter accordingly.

Briefly stated, the conceded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lakeland Water District v. Onondaga County Water AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Connolly v. O'MalleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & KonetskyNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  3. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API