Legal Opinion

American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Williams

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1977No. Docket 29993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, P. J.

Plaintiff insurer appeals from an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

Defendant Catherine Williams’ husband, Henry Williams, purchased a combination automobile policy from plaintiff on November 14, 1973. The policy included the coverage required by MCLA 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq. (no-fault), bodily injury and property damage liability coverage, comprehensive, collision and theft coverage, and "residual uninsured motorists” coverage. The policy covered two automobiles and had a total premium of $830. $20 was allocated for residual uninsured motorists…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. KarstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In re the Arbitration between Adams & Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. MesnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Murray v. FerrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schigur v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Farr v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BowerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Gardner v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API