Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & Konetsky

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arnold L. Fein, J.

This is a motion by petitioner inappropriately styled as a motion to dismiss a special proceeding which petitioner heretofore brought to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim sought by respondent-claimant. Petitioner’s application is premised upon the ground that respondent has already recovered no-fault benefits in the sum of $21,722.65, far in *844excess of the $10,000 which may be recovered under the uninsured motorist indorsement.

Upon this basis, petitioner apparently seeks a permanent stay of arbitration. The insurer claims to be entitled to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Adams & Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Spitaleri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In re the Arbitration between Szeszku & Government Employees InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fox v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API