Legal Opinion

Bartoo v. Buell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motions of plaintiffs Pangburn and Bartoo for summary judgment against defendant homeowner on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). The court further erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment to the extent that it sought dismissal of the causes of action contained in the complaints of all plaintiffs that alleged violations of Labor *820Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6). We conclude that defendant was entitled to the statutory exemption accorded to owners of one- and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cannon v. PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Devodier v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Zahn v. PaukerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Balduzzi v. WestNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Enderby v. KepplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Havens v. WitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Bartoo v. BuellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API