Legal Opinion

Bartoo v. Buell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have denied the motion of plaintiffs Skiver for summary judgment against defendant homeowner on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). Under the facts of this case, defendant was entitled to the statutory exemption accorded to owners of one- and two-family dwellings under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) (see, Cannon v Putnam, 76 NY2d 644, 649; Enderby v Keppler, 184 AD2d 1058; Devodier v Haas, 173 AD2d 437).

All concur except Lawton and Fallon, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cannon v. PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Devodier v. HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Enderby v. KepplerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Bartoo v. BuellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API