Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Dolby

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1951No. 38,401PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiff commenced an action to recover a deposit in connection with a purchase of real estate. Defendants filed an answer and counterclaim in which they sought specific performance. The defendants prevailed and plaintiff appeals.

In the petition it was alleged that Zolezzi, a real estate agent, and McDowell, an attorney, were agents of defendants Dolby, and that on March 21, 1950, Zolezzi induced plaintiff to execute a writ ing, a copy of which was attached as “Exhibit A,” and to pay McDowell $1,000. “Exhibit A” was as follows:

“Kansas City,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guild v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. Keepers v. YocumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Addington v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Steele v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Boyd v. ColganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cooley v. StevensMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Holmby, Inc. v. DinoNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Thurman v. TrimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Austin v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API