Legal Opinion

Comptoir Commercial D'Importation v. Zabriskie

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

Plaintiff, a French corporation, negotiated through Goldschmidt, a French broker, with defendants for the purchase of sugar. Prior to these specific negotiations Goldschmidt had notified the defendants: “ Sellers must produce certificate of origin stipulating that the Production Refinery does not work bounty-fed sugars. This is demanded by the Customs here and if buyers failed to produce this certificate a heavy duty would be charged * * * For all the future business it will be understood.” He further advised defendants that “ Sellers must deliver certificates of origin stipulating that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. GuinnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Sirie v. GodfreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Childs v. C. E. Riley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kantor v. Aristo Hosiery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. In re the Estate KingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API