Legal Opinion

Conover v. Hecker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1947No. Docket No. 79, Calendar No. 43,611PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff William C. Conover operates a printing office in the Cass Building in Detroit. This building is owned by defendant Christian H. Hecker, as trustee, and is managed by defendant Reaume & Silloway, Inc.

On September 21, 1944, when Conover, then aged 81, entered the building to. go to his office on the fifth floor he found that the passenger elevator was not operating. The janitor of the building unlocked the basement door so that Conover could use the freight elevator, as he had done on 25 or 30 other occasions when the passenger elevator was not. operating. The freight elevator on this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Bradley v. Burdick Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Erkiletian v. DevletianMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Oestrike v. NeifertMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geib v. SlaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Witucke v. Presque Isle BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Drinkard v. William J Pulte, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Graham v. InskeepMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API