Legal Opinion

Oestrike v. Neifert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 72, Calendar No. 37,748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff rented land for cattle pasture from defendant Neifert. Defendant Walker & Company, a corporation, maintained two large billboards for advertising purposes in the pasture field and, it is claimed, that in painting the billboards from time to time paint was dropped on the ground and quantities left in pails; that plaintiff’s cattle licked the fresh paint and consumed some of the paint in the pails on the ground, were poisoned thereby and died. This suit was brought to recover damages for loss of the cattle and, upon trial by jury, resulted in verdict and judgment for plaintiff against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lapointe v. ChevretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. KellerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Floyd Hardrick v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Warner v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Wingett v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Conover v. HeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API